Adam Smith · Complete work
Book IV, Chapter III, 2
Book IV, Chapter III, 2 of 152. Read it here for reference, or continue through the entire work without leaving the reader.
Open the complete readerOriginal 18th-century English
Thirdly, and lastly, In some places, as at Amsterdam, Hamburg, Venice, etc. foreign bills of exchange are paid in what they call bank money; while in others, as at London, Lisbon, Antwerp, Leghorn, etc. they are paid in the common currency of the country. What is called bank money, is always of more value than the same nominal sum of common currency. A thousand guilders in the bank of Amsterdam, for example, are of more value than a thousand guilders of Amsterdam currency. The difference between them is called the agio of the bank, which at Amsterdam is generally about five per cent. Supposing the current money of the two countries equally near to the standard of their respective mints, and that the one pays foreign bills in this common currency, while the other pays them in bank money, it is evident that the computed exchange may be in favour of that which pays in bank money, though the real exchange should be in favour of that which pays in current money; for the same reason that the computed exchange may be in favour of that which pays in better money, or in money nearer to its own standard, though the real exchange should be in favour of that which pays in worse. The computed exchange, before the late reformation of the gold coin, was generally against London with Amsterdam, Hamburg, Venice, and, I believe, with all other places which pay in what is called bank money. It will by no means follow, however, that the real exchange was against it. Since the reformation of the gold coin, it has been in favour of London, even with those places. The computed exchange has generally been in favour of London with Lisbon, Antwerp, Leghorn, and, if you except France, I believe with most other parts of Europe that pay in common currency; and it is not improbable that the real exchange was so too.
Digression concerning Banks of Deposit, particularly concerning that of Amsterdam.
The currency of a great state, such as France or England, generally consists almost entirely of its own coin. Should this currency, therefore, be at any time worn, clipt, or otherwise degraded below its standard value, the state, by a reformation of its coin, can effectually re-establish its currency. But the currency of a small state, such as Genoa or Hamburg, can seldom consist altogether in its own coin, but must be made up, in a great measure, of the coins of all the neighbouring states with which its inhabitants have a continual intercourse. Such a state, therefore, by reforming its coin, will not always be able to reform its currency. If foreign bills of exchange are paid in this currency, the uncertain value of any sum, of what is in its own nature so uncertain, must render the exchange always very much against such a state, its currency being in all foreign states necessarily valued even below what it is worth.
In order to remedy the inconvenience to which this disadvantageous exchange must have subjected their merchants, such small states, when they began to attend to the interest of trade, have frequently enacted that foreign bills of exchange of a certain value should be paid, not in common currency, but by an order upon, or by a transfer in the books of a certain bank, established upon the credit, and under the protection of the state, this bank being always obliged to pay, in good and true money, exactly according to the standard of the state. The banks of Venice, Genoa, Amsterdam, Hamburg, and Nuremberg, seem to have been all originally established with this view, though some of them may have afterwards been made subservient to other purposes. The money of such banks, being better than the common currency of the country, necessarily bore an agio, which was greater or smaller, according as the currency was supposed to be more or less degraded below the standard of the state. The agio of the bank of Hamburg, for example, which is said to be commonly about fourteen per cent. is the supposed difference between the good standard money of the state, and the clipt, worn, and diminished currency, poured into it from all the neighbouring states.
Before 1609, the great quantity of clipt and worn foreign coin which the extensive trade of Amsterdam brought from all parts of Europe, reduced the value of its currency about nine per cent. below that of good money fresh from the mint. Such money no sooner appeared, than it was melted down or carried away, as it always is in such circumstances. The merchants, with plenty of currency, could not always find a sufficient quantity of good money to pay their bills of exchange; and the value of those bills, in spite of several regulations which were made to prevent it, became in a great measure uncertain.
In order to remedy these inconveniencies, a bank was established in 1609, under the guarantee of the city. This bank received both foreign coin, and the light and worn coin of the country, at its real intrinsic value in the good standard money of the country, deducting only so much as was necessary for defraying the expense of coinage and the other necessary expense of management. For the value which remained after this small deduction was made, it gave a credit in its books. This credit was called bank money, which, as it represented money exactly according to the standard of the mint, was always of the same real value, and intrinsically worth more than current money. It was at the same time enacted, that all bills drawn upon or negotiated at Amsterdam, of the value of 600 guilders and upwards, should be paid in bank money, which at once took away all uncertainty in the value of those bills. Every merchant, in consequence of this regulation, was obliged to keep an account with the bank, in order to pay his foreign bills of exchange, which necessarily occasioned a certain demand for bank money.
Bank money, over and above both its intrinsic superiority to currency, and the additional value which this demand necessarily gives it, has likewise some other advantages, It is secure from fire, robbery, and other accidents; the city of Amsterdam is bound for it; it can be paid away by a simple transfer, without the trouble of counting, or the risk of transporting it from one place to another. In consequence of those different advantages, it seems from the beginning to have borne an agio; and it is generally believed that all the money originally deposited in the bank, was allowed to remain there, nobody caring to demand payment of a debt which he could sell for a premium in the market. By demanding payment of the bank, the owner of a bank credit would lose this premium. As a shilling fresh from the mint will buy no more goods in the market than one of our common worn shillings, so the good and true money which might be brought from the coffers of the bank into those of a private person, being mixed and confounded with the common currency of the country, would be of no more value than that currency, from which it could no longer be readily distinguished. While it remained in the coffers of the bank, its superiority was known and ascertained. When it had come into those of a private person, its superiority could not well be ascertained without more trouble than perhaps the difference was worth. By being brought from the coffers of the bank, besides, it lost all the other advantages of bank money; its security, its easy and safe transferability, its use in paying foreign bills of exchange. Over and above all this, it could not be brought from those coffers, as will appear by and by, without previously paying for the keeping.
Those deposits of coin, or those deposits which the bank was bound to restore in coin, constituted the original capital of the bank, or the whole value of what was represented by what is called bank money. At present they are supposed to constitute but a very small part of it. In order to facilitate the trade in bullion, the bank has been for these many years in the practice of giving credit in its books, upon deposits of gold and silver bullion. This credit is generally about five per cent. below the mint price of such bullion. The bank grants at the same time what is called a recipice or receipt, entitling the person who makes the deposit, or the bearer, to take out the bullion again at any time within six months, upon transferring to the bank a quantity of bank money equal to that for which credit had been given in its books when the deposit was made, and upon paying one-fourth per cent. for the keeping, if the deposit was in silver; and one-half per cent. if it was in gold; but at the same time declaring, that in default of such payment, and upon the expiration of this term, the deposit should belong to the bank, at the price at which it had been received, or for which credit had been given in the transfer books. What is thus paid for the keeping of the deposit may be considered as a sort of warehouse rent; and why this warehouse rent should be so much dearer for gold than for silver, several different reasons have been assigned. The fineness of gold, it has been said, is more difficult to be ascertained than that of silver. Frauds are more easily practised, and occasion a greater loss in the most precious metal. Silver, besides, being the standard metal, the state, it has been said, wishes to encourage more the making of deposits of silver than those of gold.
Deposits of bullion are most commonly made when the price is somewhat lower than ordinary, and they are taken out again when it happens to rise. In Holland the market price of bullion is generally above the mint price, for the same reason that it was so in England before the late reformation of the gold coin. The difference is said to be commonly from about six to sixteen stivers upon the mark, or eight ounces of silver, of eleven parts of fine and one part alloy. The bank price, or the credit which the bank gives for the deposits of such silver (when made in foreign coin, of which the fineness is well known and ascertained, such as Mexico dollars), is twenty-two guilders the mark: the mint price is about twenty-three guilders, and the market price is from twenty-three guilders six, to twenty-three guilders sixteen stivers, or from two to three per cent. above the mint price.
The following are the prices at which the bank of Amsterdam at present {September 1775} receives bullion and coin of different kinds:
SILVER Mexico dollars................. 22 Guilders / mark French crowns.................. 22 English silver coin............. 22 Mexico dollars, new coin........ 21 10 Ducatoons....................... 3 0 Rix-dollars..................... 2 8
Bar silver, containing 11-12ths fine silver, 21 Guilders / mark, and in this proportion down to 1-4th fine, on which 5 guilders are given. Fine bars,................. 28 Guilders / mark.
GOLD Portugal coin................. 310 Guilders / mark Guineas....................... 310 Louis d’ors, new.............. 310 Ditto old.............. 300 New ducats.................... 4 19 8 per ducat
Bar or ingot gold is received in proportion to its fineness, compared with the above foreign gold coin. Upon fine bars the bank gives 340 per mark. In general, however, something more is given upon coin of a known fineness, than upon gold and silver bars, of which the fineness cannot be ascertained but by a process of melting and assaying.
The proportions between the bank price, the mint price, and the market price of gold bullion, are nearly the same. A person can generally sell his receipt for the difference between the mint price of bullion and the market price. A receipt for bullion is almost always worth something, and it very seldom happens, therefore, that anybody suffers his receipts to expire, or allows his bullion to fall to the bank at the price at which it had been received, either by not taking it out before the end of the six months, or by neglecting to pay one fourth or one half per cent. in order to obtain a new receipt for another six months. This, however, though it happens seldom, is said to happen sometimes, and more frequently with regard to gold than with regard to silver, on account of the higher warehouse rent which is paid for the keeping of the more precious metal.
The person who, by making a deposit of bullion, obtains both a bank credit and a receipt, pays his bills of exchange as they become due, with his bank credit; and either sells or keeps his receipt, according as he judges that the price of bullion is likely to rise or to fall. The receipt and the bank credit seldom keep long together, and there is no occasion that they should. The person who has a receipt, and who wants to take out bullion, finds always plenty of bank credits, or bank money, to buy at the ordinary price, and the person who has bank money, and wants to take out bullion, finds receipts always in equal abundance.
Musean translation
Mouseia’s complete machine-assisted Musean translation, made directly from the complete English text of all five books for fidelity, the author’s force and cadence, and modern clarity.
Third and last, in some places, such as Amsterdam, Hamburg, and Venice, foreign bills of exchange are paid in what is called bank money; in others, such as London, Lisbon, Antwerp, and Leghorn, they are paid in the country's ordinary currency. Bank money is always worth more than the same nominal sum in ordinary currency. A thousand guilders in the bank of Amsterdam, for example, are worth more than a thousand guilders in Amsterdam currency. The difference is called the bank's agio, which at Amsterdam is generally about five per cent. Suppose the circulating money of two countries is equally close to the standard of each country's mint, but one country pays foreign bills in ordinary currency and the other in bank money. Plainly, the calculated exchange may favor the country paying in bank money even when the real exchange favors the one paying in circulating money. This is the same reason that the calculated exchange may favor a country paying in better money, or money nearer its own standard, even when the real exchange favors one paying in worse money. Before the recent reform of the gold coin, the calculated exchange was generally against London in dealings with Amsterdam, Hamburg, Venice, and, I believe, every other place paying in what is called bank money. It by no means follows, however, that the real exchange was against London. Since the reform of the gold coin, it has favored London even against those places. The calculated exchange has generally favored London in dealings with Lisbon, Antwerp, Leghorn, and, apart from France, I believe most other parts of Europe paying in ordinary currency; and it is not unlikely that the real exchange favored London too.
A Digression on Banks of Deposit, Particularly the Bank of Amsterdam.
The currency of a large state, such as France or England, generally consists almost wholly of its own coin. If that currency should at some point become worn, clipped, or otherwise debased below its standard value, the state can effectively restore it by reforming its coinage. The currency of a small state, such as Genoa or Hamburg, however, can seldom consist entirely of its own coin. Much of it must consist of coins from all the neighboring states with which its inhabitants continually deal. Reforming its own coin, therefore, will not always enable such a state to reform its currency. If foreign bills of exchange are paid in this currency, the uncertain value of any sum in a medium so uncertain by nature must cause the exchange to be greatly against the state: foreign countries will necessarily value its currency at even less than it is worth.
To remedy the inconvenience this unfavorable exchange must have caused their merchants, such small states, when they began to attend to the interests of trade, have often decreed that foreign bills of exchange above a certain value must be paid not in ordinary currency, but by an order on a particular bank, or a transfer in its books. The bank, established on the credit and under the protection of the state, was always obliged to pay in sound money conforming exactly to the state's standard. The banks of Venice, Genoa, Amsterdam, Hamburg, and Nuremberg all seem originally to have been founded for this purpose, though some may later have served other ends. Since the money in these banks was better than the ordinary currency of the country, it necessarily carried an agio, greater or smaller according to how far the currency was thought to have fallen below the state's standard. The agio of the bank of Hamburg, for example, commonly said to be about fourteen per cent., represents the supposed difference between the state's sound standard money and the clipped, worn, and diminished currency flowing in from all its neighbors.
Before 1609, the great quantity of clipped and worn foreign coin brought to Amsterdam from across Europe by its extensive trade had reduced the value of its currency about nine per cent. below that of sound money fresh from the mint. Whenever such fresh coin appeared, it was immediately melted down or carried off, as it always is in these circumstances. Although merchants had plenty of currency, they could not always find enough sound money to pay their bills of exchange. Despite several regulations intended to prevent this, the value of those bills consequently became largely uncertain.
To remedy these inconveniences, a bank was founded in 1609 under the city's guarantee. It accepted both foreign coin and the country's own light and worn coin at their actual intrinsic value measured in the country's sound standard money, deducting only what was needed to meet the cost of coinage and other necessary costs of administration. For the value remaining after this small deduction, it entered a credit in its books. This credit was called bank money. Because it represented money conforming exactly to the mint standard, it always had the same real value and was intrinsically worth more than circulating money. A rule was enacted at the same time requiring every bill drawn on or negotiated at Amsterdam worth 600 guilders or more to be paid in bank money, removing at once all uncertainty about the value of such bills. As a consequence, every merchant had to keep an account at the bank to pay his foreign bills of exchange, creating a necessary demand for bank money.
Besides its intrinsic superiority to currency and the additional value this demand necessarily confers, bank money has other advantages. It is safe from fire, robbery, and other accidents; the city of Amsterdam stands behind it; and it can be paid by a simple transfer, without the trouble of counting it or the risk of carrying it from place to place. Because of these several advantages, it seems to have carried an agio from the outset. It is generally believed that all the money originally deposited at the bank was left there, since no one cared to demand payment of a claim he could sell at a premium in the market. By demanding payment from the bank, the owner of a bank credit would lose that premium. Just as a shilling fresh from the mint buys no more goods in the market than one of our ordinary worn shillings, the sound money taken from the bank's coffers into a private person's, once mixed indiscriminately with the country's ordinary currency, would be worth no more than that currency, from which it could no longer easily be distinguished. So long as it remained in the bank's coffers, its superiority was known and certain. Once it passed into a private person's, establishing its superiority might take more trouble than the difference was worth. Moreover, removing it from the bank's coffers deprived it of all the other advantages of bank money: its security, its easy and safe transfer, and its use in paying foreign bills of exchange. On top of all this, as will shortly appear, it could not be removed from those coffers without first paying for its storage.
Those deposits of coin, which the bank was bound to return in coin, formed its original capital: the entire value represented by what is called bank money. Today they are believed to form only a very small part of it. To facilitate the bullion trade, the bank has for many years given credits in its books against deposits of gold and silver bullion. The credit is generally about five per cent. below the mint price of that bullion. At the same time the bank issues what is called a recipice, or receipt, entitling the depositor or bearer to withdraw the bullion at any time within six months, provided that the holder transfers to the bank as much bank money as was originally credited for the deposit and pays one-fourth per cent. for storage if the deposit was silver, or one-half per cent. if it was gold. The receipt also declares that if these payments are not made by the end of the term, the deposit becomes the bank's property at the price at which it was received, or for which credit was entered in the transfer books. The payment for storing the deposit may be regarded as a kind of warehouse rent. Several explanations have been offered for why this rent should be so much higher for gold than for silver. It has been said that the purity of gold is harder to establish than that of silver; fraud is easier and causes a greater loss with the more precious metal. It has also been said that, since silver is the standard metal, the state wishes to encourage deposits of silver more than deposits of gold.
Bullion is most commonly deposited when its price is somewhat lower than usual and withdrawn when the price rises. In Holland, the market price of bullion is generally above the mint price, for the same reason that it was in England before the recent reform of the gold coin. The difference is said commonly to range from about six to sixteen stivers per mark, or eight ounces of silver consisting of eleven parts fine silver and one part alloy. The bank price, or the credit the bank gives for deposits of such silver (when deposited as foreign coin of known and established purity, such as Mexico dollars), is twenty-two guilders per mark; the mint price is about twenty-three guilders; and the market price ranges from twenty-three guilders six to twenty-three guilders sixteen stivers, or from two to three per cent. above the mint price.
The following are the prices at which the bank of Amsterdam currently [September 1775] receives bullion and coin of different kinds:
SILVER Mexico dollars................. 22 Guilders / mark French crowns.................. 22 English silver coin............. 22 Mexico dollars, new coin........ 21 10 Ducatoons....................... 3 0 Rix-dollars..................... 2 8
Bar silver containing 11-12ths fine silver, 21 Guilders / mark, declining in proportion to 1-4th fine, for which 5 guilders are given. Fine bars,................. 28 Guilders / mark.
GOLD Portugal coin................. 310 Guilders / mark Guineas....................... 310 Louis d’ors, new.............. 310 Ditto old.............. 300 New ducats.................... 4 19 8 per ducat
Bar or ingot gold is received in proportion to its purity as compared with the foreign gold coins listed above. The bank gives 340 per mark for fine bars. Generally, however, it gives somewhat more for coin of known purity than for bars of gold and silver, whose purity can be established only by melting and assaying them.
The relations among the bank price, the mint price, and the market price of gold bullion are much the same. A person can generally sell a receipt for the difference between the mint price and the market price of bullion. A receipt for bullion is therefore almost always worth something, and it is very rare for anyone to let a receipt expire and his bullion pass to the bank at its deposit price, whether by failing to withdraw it before the six months are over or by failing to pay one fourth or one half per cent. for a new receipt lasting another six months. Yet this is said sometimes to happen, though seldom, and more often with gold than with silver because the warehouse rent for the more precious metal is higher.
A person who deposits bullion and receives both a bank credit and a receipt uses the credit to pay his bills of exchange as they fall due; he either sells or retains the receipt according to whether he expects the price of bullion to fall or rise. The receipt and bank credit seldom remain together long, nor is there any need for them to do so. A holder of a receipt who wishes to withdraw bullion can always find ample bank credits, or bank money, to purchase at the usual price; a holder of bank money wishing to withdraw bullion can likewise always find ample receipts.
Plain English translation
Mouseia’s complete Plain English edition, made independently and directly from the complete English text of all five books.
Third and last, foreign bills of exchange are paid in what people call bank money in some places, including Amsterdam, Hamburg, and Venice. In other places, including London, Lisbon, Antwerp, and Leghorn, they are paid in the country's ordinary currency. Bank money is always worth more than the same stated amount of ordinary currency. For example, a thousand guilders held in the bank of Amsterdam are worth more than a thousand guilders in Amsterdam's ordinary currency. The difference is called the bank's agio. In Amsterdam it is usually about five per cent. Suppose the circulating money of two countries is equally close to each country's mint standard. One pays foreign bills in ordinary currency, while the other pays in bank money. The calculated exchange rate could then favor the country paying in bank money, even if the actual exchange rate favors the country paying in ordinary currency. The same thing happens when the calculated rate favors a country whose money is better, or closer to its mint standard, even though the actual rate favors a country with worse money. Before the recent reform of the gold coin, the calculated exchange rate generally ran against London in its dealings with Amsterdam, Hamburg, Venice, and, I believe, all other places that pay in bank money. That does not mean the actual exchange rate ran against London. Since the gold coin was reformed, the calculated rate has favored London even in dealings with those places. It has generally favored London in dealings with Lisbon, Antwerp, Leghorn, and, apart from France, I believe most other parts of Europe that pay in ordinary currency. It is quite possible that the actual rate also favored London.
A Digression on Deposit Banks, Especially the Bank of Amsterdam.
The circulating money of a large state such as France or England usually consists almost entirely of its own coins. If those coins become worn, clipped, or otherwise worth less than their official standard, the state can restore the value of its currency by reforming its coinage. A small state such as Genoa or Hamburg can rarely circulate only its own coins. Much of its circulating money must be coins from neighboring states with which its people regularly trade. Reforming its own coinage will therefore not always restore the value of all its circulating money. If foreign bills of exchange are paid in that currency, the uncertainty about what any given amount is worth will always push the exchange rate strongly against the small state. Other countries will necessarily value its currency at even less than it is worth.
To spare their merchants the trouble caused by such an unfavorable exchange rate, small states have often acted when they began taking an interest in trade. They required foreign bills of exchange above a certain value to be paid through an order on a particular bank or a transfer in its books, rather than in ordinary currency. The state backed and protected the bank. The bank was always required to pay in sound money matching the state's official standard exactly. The banks of Venice, Genoa, Amsterdam, Hamburg, and Nuremberg all seem to have been founded for this purpose, although some later served other purposes too. The money held in these banks was better than ordinary currency, so it necessarily carried an agio. The more the circulating currency was thought to have fallen below the state's standard, the higher the agio. For example, the agio of the bank of Hamburg is said to be usually about fourteen per cent. That is the estimated gap between the state's sound standard money and the clipped, worn, reduced coins flowing in from all its neighbors.
Before 1609, Amsterdam's extensive trade brought in so many clipped and worn foreign coins from across Europe that its circulating money fell about nine per cent. below the value of sound, newly minted money. Whenever sound money appeared, it was immediately melted down or taken away, as always happens in these conditions. Merchants had plenty of currency, but they could not always find enough sound money to pay their bills of exchange. Despite several regulations intended to prevent this, the value of those bills became quite uncertain.
A bank was established in 1609 under the city's guarantee to solve these problems. It accepted foreign coins and the country's own light and worn coins at their actual metal value, measured in the country's sound standard money. It deducted only what was needed to cover coinage and other necessary operating costs. The bank entered the value remaining after that small deduction as a credit in its books. This credit was called bank money. Because it represented money matching the mint standard exactly, its actual value stayed the same, and it was worth more than circulating money. At the same time, a rule required all bills drawn on or traded in Amsterdam worth 600 guilders or more to be paid in bank money. This immediately removed any uncertainty about their value. Every merchant therefore had to keep a bank account to pay foreign bills of exchange. This created a steady demand for bank money.
Bank money has other advantages besides being worth more than ordinary currency and receiving extra value from this demand. It is safe from fire, robbery, and other accidents. The city of Amsterdam stands behind it. A simple transfer pays it to someone else without counting coins or taking the risk of moving them between places. These advantages seem to have given it an agio from the beginning. People generally believe that all the money originally deposited stayed in the bank. Nobody wanted repayment of a claim that could be sold at a premium in the market. By demanding payment from the bank, an account holder would lose that premium. A newly minted shilling buys no more in the market than an ordinary worn shilling. In the same way, sound money taken from the bank and put into private hands would mix with the ordinary currency and become no more valuable than it. People could no longer easily tell it apart. Its superior quality was known and verified while it remained in the bank. Once it was in private hands, verifying that quality could take more trouble than the difference in value was worth. Taking it out of the bank would also strip it of every other advantage of bank money: security, easy and safe transfers, and use in paying foreign bills of exchange. And, as we will see shortly, it could not be withdrawn without first paying a storage charge.
Deposits of coins that the bank was obliged to repay in coins made up its original capital. They accounted for the full value represented by bank money at first. People now think they make up only a very small part of it. For many years, to make bullion trading easier, the bank has entered credits in its books for deposits of gold and silver bullion. The credit is generally about five per cent. below the mint price of that bullion. The bank also issues what it calls a recipice, or receipt. This allows either the depositor or whoever holds the receipt to withdraw the bullion at any time within six months. To do so, the holder must transfer back to the bank an amount of bank money equal to the credit originally given for the deposit. The holder must also pay a storage charge of one-fourth per cent. for silver or one-half per cent. for gold. If the holder does not make those payments before the six months end, the deposit becomes the bank's property at the price at which the bank accepted it, the amount credited in its books. The storage charge can be thought of as warehouse rent. Several explanations have been offered for why this rent is so much higher for gold than for silver. Some say it is harder to determine the purity of gold than of silver. Fraud is easier and causes a greater loss with the more precious metal. Others say that because silver is the standard metal, the state wants to encourage silver deposits more than gold deposits.
People most often deposit bullion when its price is somewhat below normal, and withdraw it when the price rises. In Holland the market price of bullion is generally above the mint price, for the same reason this was true in England before the recent reform of the gold coin. The difference is said to be usually from about six to sixteen stivers per mark, or eight ounces of silver containing eleven parts fine silver and one part alloy. For deposits of this silver in foreign coins of known, verified purity, such as Mexico dollars, the bank gives credit at twenty-two guilders per mark. The mint price is about twenty-three guilders. The market price ranges from twenty-three guilders six to twenty-three guilders sixteen stivers, or from two to three per cent. above the mint price.
The following are the prices at which the bank of Amsterdam currently [September 1775] accepts bullion and different kinds of coins:
SILVER Mexico dollars................. 22 Guilders / mark French crowns.................. 22 English silver coin............. 22 Mexico dollars, new coin........ 21 10 Ducatoons....................... 3 0 Rix-dollars..................... 2 8
Silver bars containing 11-12ths fine silver: 21 Guilders / mark, decreasing in proportion down to 1-4th fine silver, for which the bank gives 5 guilders. Fine bars,................. 28 Guilders / mark.
GOLD Portugal coin................. 310 Guilders / mark Guineas....................... 310 Louis d’ors, new.............. 310 Ditto old.............. 300 New ducats.................... 4 19 8 per ducat
The bank accepts gold bars or ingots at prices based on their purity relative to the foreign gold coins listed above. It gives 340 per mark for fine bars. In general, though, it pays a little more for coins of known purity than for gold and silver bars. The purity of bars can be determined only by melting and testing them.
The relationship among the bank price, mint price, and market price of gold bullion is much the same. Someone can usually sell a receipt for the difference between bullion's mint price and market price. A bullion receipt is almost always worth something. People therefore very rarely let receipts expire and let the bank acquire their bullion at its original deposit price. They usually either withdraw it within six months or pay one-fourth or one-half per cent. for another six-month receipt. It is said that receipts do sometimes expire, though rarely, and more often for gold than for silver because storing the more precious metal costs more.
Someone who deposits bullion receives both a bank credit and a receipt. The depositor uses the credit to pay bills of exchange as they come due, and sells or keeps the receipt according to whether bullion prices seem likely to rise or fall. The receipt and credit rarely stay together for long, and they do not need to. A receipt holder who wants to withdraw bullion can always buy plenty of bank credits, or bank money, at the normal price. Someone with bank money who wants to withdraw bullion can likewise find plenty of receipts to buy.