Book 4, Chapter 20
Original Latin
45 Ipsam aegritudinem, quam nos ut taetram et inmanem beluam fugiendam diximus, non sine magna utilitate a natura dicunt constitutam, ut homines castigationibus reprehensionibus ignominiis adfici se in delicto dolerent. impunitas enim peccatorum data videtur eis qui ignominiam et infamiam ferunt sine dolore; morderi est melius conscientia. ex quo est illud e vita ductum ab Afranio: nam cum dissolutus filius: ‘heu me miserum!’ tum severus pater: ‘dum modo doleat aliquid, doleat quidlubet.’
46 Reliquas quoque partis aegritudinis utilis esse dicunt, misericordiam ad opem ferendam et calamitates hominum indignorum sublevandas; ipsum illud aemulari obtrectare non esse inutile, cum aut se non idem videat consecutum, quod alium, aut alium idem, quod se; metum vero si qui sustulisset, omnem vitae diligentiam sublatam fore, quae summa esset in eis qui leges, qui magistratus, qui paupertatem, qui ignominiam, qui mortem, qui dolorem timerent. Haec tamen ita disputant, ut resecanda esse fateantur, evelli penitus dicant nec posse nec opus esse et in omnibus fere rebus mediocritatem esse optumam existiment. quae cum exponunt, nihilne tibi videntur an aliquid dicere?
Mihi vero dicere aliquid, itaque expecto, quid ad ista.
Musean translation
Complete machine-assisted translation from the Latin. Latin transcription by the Perseus Project, Trustees of Tufts University, CC BY-SA 4.0.
45 “They say that even distress, which we said must be shunned like a foul and monstrous beast, was established by nature for considerable benefit: when people have done wrong, they should feel pain at chastisement, rebuke, and disgrace. Those who bear dishonor and infamy without pain seem to have been granted impunity for their faults. It is better to be bitten by conscience. Hence that scene Afranius drew from life: when the dissolute son cries, ‘Ah, poor me!’ the stern father answers, ‘Let him feel pain at anything, so long as he feels some pain.’
46 “They say the other kinds of distress are useful too: pity, for bringing help and relieving the misfortunes of people who do not deserve them; even emulation and jealousy are not useless, when one sees either that one has not obtained what another has, or that another has obtained the same as oneself. If anyone removed fear, they say, all care in living would be removed. Such care is greatest in people who fear the laws, magistrates, poverty, disgrace, death, and pain. In arguing this way, however, they admit that these feelings should be pruned back; they say they cannot and need not be torn out by the roots, and think that in almost everything the middle measure is best. When they set out these arguments, do they seem to you to be saying nothing, or something?”
“To me they certainly seem to be saying something. So I am waiting to hear your reply.”
Plain English translation
Complete independent machine-assisted translation directly from the Latin. Latin transcription by the Perseus Project, Trustees of Tufts University, CC BY-SA 4.0.
45 “Even distress itself, which we said should be avoided like a foul and monstrous beast, is something they say nature established for a very useful purpose. When people do wrong, the scolding, blame, and disgrace they suffer should hurt them. People who endure disgrace and a bad reputation without pain seem to have been given permission to do wrong without punishment. It’s better to feel a bite of conscience. Hence Afranius’ words, drawn from life. A wayward son says, ‘Oh, I’m miserable!’ and his strict father answers, ‘As long as something hurts him, let it be anything at all.’
46 “They find uses for the remaining kinds of distress as well. Pity prompts help and relief for people suffering undeserved disasters. Even jealousy and emulation have their uses, they argue: you notice either that another has gained something you haven’t, or that another has gained what you have too. Remove fear, they say, and you remove all the care people take over their lives. Those most careful are the ones afraid of laws, magistrates, poverty, disgrace, death, and pain. They do, however, concede a need to prune these feelings. Uprooting them completely, they say, is impossible and unnecessary; in nearly everything they judge the moderate course best. Does their case sound entirely empty to you, or is there something to it?”
“They certainly seem to have a point. So I’m waiting to hear your answer.”
About this section
Book 4, Chapter 20 is part of Tusculan Disputations by Marcus Tullius Cicero. This page sets the Latin original beside 2 direct-source translations, so any line can be checked against the source. It is part 130 of 189 in the work, which is kept in the Roman tradition.
Open the work page for the full contents, every edition, and the download links, or go back to Explore to browse other complete works in the Roman tradition. The reader keeps your place when you are signed in and lets you compare the original with each translation, one edition at a time.