Book 1, Chapter 33
Original Latin
72 Quae vero aut coniectura explicantur aut eventis animadversa ac notata sunt, ea genera divinandi, ut supra dixi, non naturalia, sed artificiosa dicuntur; in quo haruspices, augures coniectoresque numerantur. Haec inprobantur a Peripateticis, a Stoicis defenduntur. Quorum alia sunt posita in monumentis et disciplina, quod Etruscorum declarant et haruspicini et fulgurales et rituales libri, vestri etiam augurales, alia autem subito ex tempore coniectura explicantur, ut apud Homerum Calchas, qui ex passerum numero belli Troiani annos auguratus est, et ut in Sullae scriptum historia videmus, quod te inspectante factum est, ut, cum ille in agro Nolano inmolaret ante praetorium, ab infima ara subito anguis emergeret, cum quidem C. Postumius haruspex oraret illum, ut in expeditionem exercitum educeret; id cum Sulla fecisset, tum ante oppidum Nolam florentissuma Samnitium castra cepit.
73 Facta coniectura etiam in Dionysio est, paulo ante quam regnare coepit; qui cum per agrum Leontinum iter faciens equum ipse demisisset in flumen, submersus equus voraginibus non exstitit; quem cum maxima contentione non potuisset extrahere, discessit, ut ait Philistus, aegre ferens. Cum autem aliquantum progressus esset, subito exaudivit hinnitum respexitque et equum alacrem laetus aspexit, cuius in iuba examen apium consederat. Quod ostentum habuit hanc vim, ut Dionysius paucis post diebus regnare coeperit.
Musean translation
Complete machine-assisted Musean translation, made directly from the Latin in separate source-only tasks and reviewed throughout against it. Both books, all 130 chapters and 282 numbered sections; no historical English translation used. Latin transcription credited to the Perseus Project under CC BY-SA 4.0, Müller’s 1915 Teubner edition.
72 “But those forms of divination that are explained by interpretation, or have been observed and recorded through their outcomes, are called, as I said above, not natural but artificial. Among their practitioners are haruspices, augurs, and interpreters of signs. The Peripatetics reject these arts; the Stoics defend them. Some are established in records and systematic teaching, as the Etruscan books on haruspicy, lightning, and ritual show, along with your own books on augury. Other signs are interpreted on the spur of the moment: Homer has Calchas predict the number of years of the Trojan War from the number of sparrows. Again, we read in Sulla's history of something you witnessed. As he was sacrificing before his headquarters in the territory of Nola, a snake suddenly emerged from the foot of the altar. Gaius Postumius the haruspex begged him to lead his army out on an expedition. Sulla did so, and captured the Samnites' powerfully equipped camp outside the town of Nola.
73 “A sign was also interpreted in the case of Dionysius, shortly before he began to reign. Traveling through the territory of Leontini, he led his horse down into a river himself; the horse sank in the whirlpools and did not surface. Despite tremendous efforts he could not drag it out, and went away in distress, as Philistus relates. But when he had gone some distance, he suddenly heard a neigh. He looked back and was delighted to see his horse, full of life, with a swarm of bees settled in its mane. This portent meant that Dionysius would begin to reign a few days later, as he did.
Plain English translation
Complete machine-assisted Plain English translation, made independently and directly from the Latin, never from the Musean edition. Both books and every numbered section; a separate Latin-source model review covered the entire text. No human specialist review is claimed.
72 “But the kinds of divination explained by interpretation, or observed and recorded from their results, are called artificial rather than natural, as I said above. This category covers the haruspex's work, augury, and the interpretation of signs. The Stoics support it; the Peripatetics do not. Some depend on records and systematic teaching. The Etruscan books on inspecting entrails, on lightning, and on rituals show this, as do your own books on augury. Others involve an interpretation made on the spot. For example, Homer's Calchas used the sparrow count to predict how many years the war at Troy would last. There is also an incident recorded in Sulla's history which happened while you were watching. While he was sacrificing in the territory of Nola, in front of his headquarters, a snake suddenly came out from the bottom of the altar. The haruspex Gaius Postumius begged Sulla to take the army on campaign. Following this advice, Sulla captured the heavily manned Samnite camp outside the town of Nola.
73 “An interpretation was also made in the case of Dionysius, shortly before he became ruler. On a journey across Leontini's territory, he himself took his horse down into the river. The horse sank in the swirling water and did not come up. Despite his greatest efforts he could not pull it out. He went away distressed, as Philistus tells us. Some way farther on, a sudden neigh reached him. Turning around, he joyfully found the horse lively again; bees had gathered in a swarm on its mane. The sign meant that Dionysius would become ruler a few days later, as he did.
About this section
Book 1, Chapter 33 is part of On Divination by Marcus Tullius Cicero. This page sets the Latin original beside 2 direct-source translations, so any line can be checked against the source. It is chapter 33 of 130 in the work, which is kept in the Roman tradition.
Open the work page for the full contents, every edition, and the download links, or go back to Explore to browse other complete works in the Roman tradition. The reader keeps your place when you are signed in and lets you compare the original with each translation, one edition at a time.