Mouseiaan open library of the ancient world

Book 4, Chapter 12

122 of 189 parts in Tusculan Disputations by Marcus Tullius Cicero

Original Latin

Atque ut ad valetudinis similitudinem veniamus eaque conlatione utamur aliquando, sed parcius quam solent Stoici: ut sunt alii ad alios morbos procliviores —itaque dicimus gravidinosos quosdam, <quosdam> torminosos, non quia iam sint, sed quia saepe sint—, <sic> alii ad metum, alii ad aliam perturbationem; ex quo in aliis anxietas, unde anxii, in aliis iracundia dicitur. quae ab ira differt, estque aliud iracundum esse, aliud iratum, ut differt anxietas ab angore (neque enim omnes anxii, qui anguntur aliquando, nec, qui anxii, semper anguntur), ut inter ebrietatem <et ebriositatem> interest, aliudque est amatorem esse, aliud amantem. atque haec aliorum ad alios morbos proclivitas late patet; nam pertinet ad omnes perturbationes;

28 in multis etiam vitiis apparet, sed nomen res non habet. ergo et invidi et malivoli et libidinosi et timidi et misericordes, quia proclives ad eas perturbationes <sunt>, non quia semper feruntur. haec igitur proclivitas ad suum quodque genus a similitudine corporis aegrotatio dicatur, dum ea intellegatur ad aegrotandum proclivitas. sed haec in bonis rebus, quod alii ad alia bona sunt aptiores, facilitas nominetur, in malis proclivitas , ut significet lapsionem, in neutris habeat superius nomen.

Musean translation

Complete machine-assisted translation from the Latin. Latin transcription by the Perseus Project, Trustees of Tufts University, CC BY-SA 4.0.

“To come to the analogy with bodily health, and at last make use of that comparison, though more sparingly than the Stoics usually do: just as different people are more prone to different diseases—we call some people prone to colds, <others> to colic, not because they have these conditions now but because they often do—<so> some are prone to fear, others to some other disturbance. Hence we speak of anxiety in some, and call them anxious, and of irascibility in others. Irascibility differs from anger: being irascible is one thing, being angry another, just as anxiety differs from anguish. Not everyone who sometimes feels anguish is anxious, nor are anxious people always in anguish. In the same way there is a difference between drunkenness <and habitual drunkenness>, and between being a womanizer and being in love. This tendency of different people toward different diseases has a wide scope, for it extends to every disturbance.

28 “It appears in many vices too, but has no name of its own. People are called envious, malicious, lustful, timid, and compassionate because they <are> prone to those disturbances, not because they are always carried away by them. Let this tendency toward each particular kind be called an infirmity, by analogy with the body, provided it is understood as a tendency to become ill. In good things, however, when different people have greater aptitude for different goods, let it be called a facility; in bad things, a proclivity, to suggest a downward slide; in neutral things, let it keep the earlier name.”

Plain English translation

Complete independent machine-assisted translation directly from the Latin. Latin transcription by the Perseus Project, Trustees of Tufts University, CC BY-SA 4.0.

“Now let’s try that comparison with physical health, though we won’t lean on it as heavily as the Stoics do. Certain bodies tend to catch certain diseases. Calling someone subject to colds or colic doesn’t mean they have one now: it means they often do. Likewise, one person tends toward fear, another toward some other disturbance. Hence we speak of anxiety and anxious people, or of a bad temper in others. Having a bad temper and being angry are different things. Anxiety and anguish differ too: occasional anguish doesn’t make everyone anxious, and an anxious person needn’t be constantly in anguish. Being drunk differs from habitual drunkenness; being inclined to love differs from actually being in love. This pattern, in which different people tend toward different diseases, has a wide reach. It extends to all the disturbances.

28 “It also appears in many defects for which there’s no name for the condition. People are called envious, ill-willed, prone to craving, fearful, and pitying because they’re disposed to those disturbances, not because they’re always carried away by them. By analogy with the body, let’s call this tendency toward each particular kind an ‘illness,’ as long as we understand that it means a tendency to become ill. But in good matters, since some people are better suited to one good thing and some to another, let’s call it an ‘aptitude.’ In bad matters, let’s call it a ‘proneness,’ to suggest slipping downward; in matters neither good nor bad, let it keep the earlier name.”

About this section

Book 4, Chapter 12 is part of Tusculan Disputations by Marcus Tullius Cicero. This page sets the Latin original beside 2 direct-source translations, so any line can be checked against the source. It is part 122 of 189 in the work, which is kept in the Roman tradition.

Open the work page for the full contents, every edition, and the download links, or go back to Explore to browse other complete works in the Roman tradition. The reader keeps your place when you are signed in and lets you compare the original with each translation, one edition at a time.

Download the complete work as JSON · Retex Markdown