Book 4, Chapter 31
Original Latin
Ac de malorum opinione hactenus;
65 videamus nunc de bonorum, id est de laetitia et de cupiditate. mihi quidem in tota ratione ea, quae pertinet ad animi perturbationem, una res videtur causam continere, omnis eas esse in nostra potestate, omnis iudicio susceptas, omnis voluntarias. hic igitur error est eripiendus, haec detrahenda opinio atque ut in malis opinatis tolerabilia, sic in bonis sedatiora sunt efficienda ea quae magna et laetabilia ducuntur. atque hoc quidem commune malorum et bonorum, ut, si iam difficile sit persuadere nihil earum rerum, quae perturbent animum, aut in bonis aut in malis esse habendum, tamen alia ad alium motum curatio sit adhibenda aliaque ratione malevolus, alia amator, alia rursus anxius, alia timidus corrigendus.
66 atque erat facile sequentem eam rationem, quae maxume probatur de bonis et malis, negare umquam laetitia adfici posse insipientem, quod nihil umquam haberet boni; sed loquimur nunc more communi. sint sane ista bona, quae putantur, honores divitiae voluptates cetera, tamen in eis ipsis potiundis exultans gestiensque laetitia turpis est, ut, si ridere concessum sit, vituperetur tamen cachinnatio. eodem enim vitio est ecfusio animi in laetitia quo in dolore contractio, eademque levitate cupiditas est in appetendo qua laetitia in fruendo, et ut nimis adflicti molestia, sic nimis elati laetitia iure iudicantur leves; et, cum invidere aegritudinis sit, malis autem alienis voluptatem capere laetitiae, utrumque immanitate et feritate quadam proponenda castigari solet; atque ut cavere decet, timere non decet, sic gaudere decet, laetari non decet, quoniam docendi causa a gaudio laetitiam distinguimus;
67 illud iam supra diximus, contractionem animi recte fieri numquam posse, elationem posse. aliter enim Naevianus ille gaudet Hector: Laétus sum laudári me abs te, páter, a laudató viro, aliter ille apud Trabeam: Léna deleníta argento nútum observabít meum, Quíd velim, quid stúdeam. adveniens dígito impellam iánuam, Fóres patebunt. de ínproviso Chrýsis ubi me aspéxerit, Álacris ob viám mihi veniet cómplexum exoptáns meum, Míhi se dedet. quam haec pulchra putet, ipse iam dicet: Fórtunam ipsam anteíbo fortunís meis.
Musean translation
Complete machine-assisted translation from the Latin. Latin transcription by the Perseus Project, Trustees of Tufts University, CC BY-SA 4.0.
“So much for belief in evils.
65 “Let us now consider belief in goods, that is, delight and desire. To my mind, the entire account of disturbances of the soul rests on a single point: all are within our power, all are taken on through judgment, all are voluntary. This error must therefore be torn away, this belief removed. Just as supposed evils must be made more bearable, so things thought great and delightful must be made less exciting. Goods and evils have this in common: even if it is difficult to persuade someone that none of the things disturbing the soul should be counted either as goods or as evils, a different treatment must still be applied to each movement. One method must correct the malicious person, another the lover, another again the anxious person, another the timid.
66 “It would be easy, following the most widely approved account of goods and evils, to deny that an unwise person could ever feel delight, since he could never possess any good. But we are speaking now in ordinary terms. Let the things thought good—office, wealth, pleasures, and the rest—indeed be goods; even so, exultant, exuberant delight in possessing them is shameful, just as, though laughter may be allowed, guffawing is still censured. The soul’s outpouring in delight has the same defect as its contraction in pain; desire in pursuit displays the same instability as delight in enjoyment. Just as those excessively crushed by vexation are rightly judged unstable, so are those excessively elated by delight. Since envy belongs to distress, while taking pleasure in another’s misfortunes belongs to delight, both are commonly reproved by setting their monstrous and savage character before us. And just as caution is proper but fear is not, so joy is proper but delight is not, since for the sake of instruction we distinguish delight from joy.
67 “We have already said above that a contraction of the soul can never be right, but its elevation can. Hector in Naevius feels joy in one way:
“‘I am glad to be praised by you, Father, a man praised himself.’
“The character in Trabea feels it in another:
“‘The procuress, soothed with silver, will watch my nod,“‘What I wish, what I desire. Coming up, I shall push the door with a finger;“‘The doors will open. When Chrysis sees me unexpectedly,“‘She will hurry joyfully to meet me, longing for my embrace,“‘And give herself to me.’
“How splendid he thinks this, he will now tell us himself:
“‘I shall outstrip Fortune herself with my good fortune.’”
Plain English translation
Complete independent machine-assisted translation directly from the Latin. Latin transcription by the Perseus Project, Trustees of Tufts University, CC BY-SA 4.0.
“That’s enough about the belief in evils.
65 “Turn now to supposed goods: desire and delight. To me, one point explains the entire subject of mental disturbance. Every disturbance is ours to control; judgment admits each one, and each is voluntary. We have to uproot this error and take away this belief. Things counted as evils must become bearable; things counted as great, delightful goods must lose their power to excite. Both good and evil cases share another feature. Even if persuading someone that none of the mind’s disturbing objects deserves the name good or bad proves difficult, each particular movement still needs its own treatment. Correcting ill will, love, anxiety, and fear will require four different approaches.
66 “Following the account of good and evil I approve of most, it would be easy to deny that an unwise person can ever feel delight, since they never have anything good. But we’re speaking in everyday terms now. Let’s grant that the supposed goods really are good: offices, wealth, pleasures, and the rest. Even so, leaping, unrestrained delight in possessing these very things is shameful. We may allow laughter but still criticize guffawing. The mind’s outpouring in delight is defective in the same way as its shrinking in pain. Desire shows the same instability in pursuing as delight does in enjoying. People excessively uplifted by delight are rightly judged unstable, just like those excessively crushed by trouble. And since envy belongs to distress, while taking pleasure in others’ misfortunes belongs to delight, we usually correct both by pointing out a certain monstrous cruelty in them. Just as it’s proper to be cautious but not to be afraid, it’s proper to feel joy but not delight. For teaching purposes, we’re distinguishing delight from joy.
67 “Earlier we said that no shrinking of spirit is ever right, though a rising of spirit can be. Compare two ways of feeling joy. Naevius’ Hector says: “‘Father, praise from you delights me: you yourself have won praise.’ “Trabea’s character says instead: “‘Silver will charm the madam; she’ll watch every nod of mine, “‘What I want, what I’m pursuing. Arriving, I’ll tap the door with a finger, “‘And it will swing open. At the sudden sight of me, Chrysis “‘Will come eagerly toward me, craving my arms around her; “‘She’ll surrender herself to me.’ “Now hear how splendid he considers his prospects: “‘My good fortune will leave Fortune herself behind.’”
About this section
Book 4, Chapter 31 is part of Tusculan Disputations by Marcus Tullius Cicero. This page sets the Latin original beside 2 direct-source translations, so any line can be checked against the source. It is chapter 141 of 189 in the work, which is kept in the Roman tradition.
Open the work page for the full contents, every edition, and the download links, or go back to Explore to browse other complete works in the Roman tradition. The reader keeps your place when you are signed in and lets you compare the original with each translation, one edition at a time.