Book 4, Chapter 23
Original Latin
51 Neque enim est ulla fortitudo, quae rationis est expers. ‘contemnendae res humanae sunt, neglegenda mors est, patibiles et dolores et labores putandi’— haec cum constituta sunt iudicio atque sententia, tum est robusta illa et stabilis fortitudo, nisi forte, quae vehementer acriter animose fiunt, iracunde fieri suspicamur. mihi ne Scipio quidem ille pontufex maxumus, qui hoc Stoicorum verum esse declaravit, numquam privatum esse sapientem, iratus videtur fuisse Ti. Graccho tum, cum consulem languentem reliquit atque ipse privatus, ut si consul esset, qui rem publicam salvam esse vellent, se sequi iussit.
52 nescio, ecquid ipsi nos fortiter in re p. fecerimus: si quid fecimus, certe irati non fecimus. an est quicquam similius insaniae quam ira? quam bene Ennius ‘initium’ dixit ‘insaniae.’ color, vox, oculi, spiritus, inpotentia dictorum ac factorum quam partem habent sanitatis? quid Achille Homerico foedius, quid Agamemnone in iurgio? nam Aiacem quidem ira ad furorem mortemque perduxit. non igitur desiderat fortitudo advocatam iracundiam; satis est instructa parata armata per sese. nam isto quidem modo licet dicere utilem vinulentiam ad fortitudinem, utilem etiam dementiam, quod et insani et ebrii multa faciunt saepe vehementius. semper Aiax fortis, fortissimus tamen in furore; nam Fácinus fecit máximum, cum Dánais inclinántibus Summám rem perfecít manu.
Musean translation
Complete machine-assisted translation from the Latin. Latin transcription by the Perseus Project, Trustees of Tufts University, CC BY-SA 4.0.
51 “There is no courage without reason. ‘Human affairs are to be held of little account; death is to be disregarded; pain and toil are to be thought bearable.’ Once these principles have been established by judgment and conviction, courage is strong and stable—unless perhaps we suspect that whatever is done vigorously, sharply, and spiritedly is done in anger. I do not think even that Scipio, the chief pontiff who proved the Stoics’ claim that the wise person is never a private citizen, was angry with Tiberius Gracchus when he abandoned the faltering consul and, though himself a private citizen, ordered all who wished the commonwealth safe to follow him, as though he were consul.
52 “I do not know whether I myself have done anything courageous in public affairs. If I have, I certainly did not do it in anger. Is anything more like insanity than anger? How well Ennius called it ‘the beginning of insanity’! The complexion, voice, eyes, breathing, the loss of control in words and deeds—what share have they in sanity? What is uglier than Homer’s Achilles, or Agamemnon in their quarrel? As for Ajax, anger led him to madness and death. Courage, then, needs no anger summoned to its aid: it is sufficiently equipped, prepared, and armed in itself. By that reasoning, we might also call drunkenness useful to courage, and even madness useful, because madmen and drunkards often act with greater violence. Ajax was always courageous, but most courageous when mad; for
“‘He did his greatest deed when, with the Greeks giving way,“‘His hand brought the decisive work to completion.’”
Plain English translation
Complete independent machine-assisted translation directly from the Latin. Latin transcription by the Perseus Project, Trustees of Tufts University, CC BY-SA 4.0.
51 “Reason is essential to any courage at all. Settle in judgment and conviction that ‘Human concerns deserve contempt; death deserves no attention; pains and hardships can be endured,’ and courage stands strong and firm. Unless we’re to label every forceful, energetic, spirited action angry! Think even of Scipio the chief priest, the man who proved the Stoic claim that the wise person never has merely private standing. I don’t think he was angry with Tiberius Gracchus when he abandoned the inactive consul and, despite holding no office, gave a consul’s order: everyone wanting to save the republic was to follow him.
52 “Whether my own public conduct includes any brave act, I don’t know. Any I did perform certainly weren’t angry ones. What resembles madness more closely than anger? Ennius’ description, ‘the start of insanity,’ is excellent. Look at the complexion, voice, eyes, breath, uncontrolled speech and deeds: where’s sanity in any of it? In Homer’s quarrel, could anything be uglier than Achilles or Agamemnon? Ajax’s anger actually ended in madness and death. Courage needs no angry helper. Its own equipment, readiness, and weapons are quite sufficient. The same argument would recommend drunkenness for courage, and madness too: drunk and mad people often do things with unusual force. Ajax never lacked courage, yet in madness he showed the most, since “‘His greatest deed came as the Greeks began to yield: “‘His hand brought the decisive struggle to success.’”
About this section
Book 4, Chapter 23 is part of Tusculan Disputations by Marcus Tullius Cicero. This page sets the Latin original beside 2 direct-source translations, so any line can be checked against the source. It is chapter 133 of 189 in the work, which is kept in the Roman tradition.
Open the work page for the full contents, every edition, and the download links, or go back to Explore to browse other complete works in the Roman tradition. The reader keeps your place when you are signed in and lets you compare the original with each translation, one edition at a time.